to source, I’ve lightly edited it (pruned it a bit). Here ’tis—


Eight pictures to make you think… and Churchill foresaw it

Be sure to read Churchill’s comments at the end.

There are no words to add to this!!!  But Churchill saw it coming. 

 Screen Shot 2016-05-20 at 08.13.49
Screen Shot 2016-05-20 at 08.16.00


Screen Shot 2016-05-20 at 08.14.22

Screen Shot 2016-05-20 at 08.18.51 
Screen Shot 2016-05-20 at 08.20.07

  …And some people still do not see a reason to worry! 

“Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the  world.”


“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy.
The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the
Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Muslims may
show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it.
No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step;
and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.” 

Sir Winston Churchill; (Source: The River War, first edition, Vol II, pages 248-250 London).
Churchill saw it coming.


—and there you have it, a glimpse into the crystal ball. Make of it what you will.

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 16.31.48







when someone of Obama’s standing tells folks to throw open their doors (snippet below clipped a bit for clarity)

“A wall won’t stop that,” Obama said, bringing to mind Trump’s call for building a border wall …

“The point is, to help ourselves, we’ve got to help others – not pull up the drawbridge and try to keep the world out.”

… Repeatedly, Obama referred to disparaging comments about Muslims and immigrants …

But he appeared most incensed by what he described as a rejection of facts, science and intellectualism that he said was pervading politics …

“In politics and in life, ignorance is not a virtue,” Obama said. “It’s not cool to not know what you’re talking about. “That’s not keeping it real or telling it like it is. That’s not challenging political correctness. That’s just not knowing what you’re talking about,” …


I think it’s a wonderful idea and I’m glad that New Zealand is finally coming onboard too. We just don’t see enough black bags prowling our streets—and we are deprived, dammit, we don’t seem to have any sharia patrols out after dark beating up courting couples. Why should we be left out?

And of course—we OWE it to them, poor things. We are human, they are human, and really under the skin we are all one big happy family, no? I mean just look at this picture—


Screen Shot 2016-05-18 at 08.01.14


We kiwis also have calls to invite in hordes more of Islamic refugees. Hell, we have the room. Dammit, if we simply adapted our laws only a tiny bit—possibly by invoking Emergency Powers under some UN justification—we could have every home in New Zealand set aside at least one room for a family of Islam. Think about it, we have … I don’t know, about four million people? Given a ‘nuclear’ family of four, one to a house, that would be about a million rooms—and given that Islamics breed like rabb  bunnie more than us—


—and that at a moment’s notice. Beat that, world! (I told you we kiwis were sweet, kind, generous, clever*, and have the best rugby players and mountaineers in all history. Now we’re the most charitable, boom boom!

By the way … did you visit my yesterday’s post? In brief I reposted verbatim the post of some guy in the UK. It’s years old now but worth the read—

to go there: CLICK HERE

semper vigilans—and if you actually do think that we should be opening our doors to these poor folks, and if you did read it …

… I offer that you should go back and read it again.

AND NOW: you can please tell me where ol’ Steve is wrong?

In the meantime I’m off to see how I can vote for the nice Mr Dunne. He’d make an excellent ambassador to the Middle East if ever he loses his job. (Hey: how come Australia isn’t taking more**? They even have huge deserts where the occasional Arab and Muslim immigrant might feel much more at home.)


* C’mon … who split the first atom then, hey?

** Or Saudi Arabia—and those guys can afford it (price of oil coming back up)



At the risk of being so, I must post snippets from something I downloaded some time ago, and below that the link to it—  Criticise rulers?

—oops, no I won’t … link no longer works. Bugger. It was to a ‘’ blog that I guess no longer exists. So here’s the whole thing, and the writer was one Steve Hayes (he may still be posting, I don’t know)(yet). Anyway …

“Islam is dangerous. Here in the West, it seems that most people are incapable of appreciating the seriousness of that threat. It is as though centuries of religious tolerance, secularism and even outright disbelief have rendered many incapable of a true appreciation of the motive power of belief.

I have attempted to address this issue before. But it seems that many cannot understand that when Muslims take to the streets demanding the beheading of all infidels, when suicide bombers murder innocents, when women are stoned to death for being raped that these are not the actions of a few deranged fundamentalists, not some perversion of the religion, but the true and genuine face of Islam. I will therefore in this post simply point out and briefly explain the basic tenets of Islam.

Islam is written down in the Koran. It cannot be changed, up-dated, re-interpreted or modernized. It is the unchangeable Word of God. To try to change the Koran is punishable by death. And it contains clear instructions for its spread, making it a holy duty to convert the entire world.

Islam demands that Muslims create a state that enforces it. No other religion has ever required, as a religious duty, that the government enforce the religion. It even has it own system of law to facilitate this duty. It is called Sharia and it is barbarous.

The Koran further requires that Islam be spread by the use of war. Whilst members of other religious faiths have attempted to impose their religion by force, they have struggled to reconcile such behaviour with their own doctrines. In Islam it is a holy duty. It helps to save the poor infidels from their sin. This is the only way to bring submission to the Will of God on Earth. The Prophet provides the perfect example. Whilst he tried to convert people by persuasion, he gained after thirteen years a mere one hundred and fifty followers. When he took the path of violence, within ten years he had tens of thousands of converts. His followers added millions by the same methods; and now it stands at over a billion.

Islam holds that contraction is bad and expansion good. So any lands lost such as Spain and Israel must be re-conquered. Moreover, any lands that do not follow the laws of Allah must be conquered and Sharia imposed. It is a sin not to do so.

In order to ensure as many children, new Muslims, as possible, a Muslim man may have up to four wives and have sex with as many slave (ie, infidel) girls as he wishes.

It is a punishable offence, punishable by death, to criticise Islam. Just to spell this out: no freedom of speech and without freedom of speech there is no means to defend any freedom.

Furthermore, you are not allowed to leave Islam. So contrary to international law or any sense of morality, if you even for a moment profess a belief in Islam you can be legitimately murdered should you subsequently change your mind. This means anyone who is not following Islam to the letter is an apostate and should be punished by death; a major reason why there are no moderate Muslims. Anytime someone wishes to up-date Islam and, for instance, give women equal rights, they are labelled apostate and subject to murder.

Next it is imperative that your first allegiance as a Muslim is to other Muslims. This means that your loyalty is not to yourself, your family, your tribe or your nation: it is to Islam alone. This creates unity across borders.

If you are a man, the only way to ensure you will go to Paradise is to die fighting for the cause. No matter how good a Muslim you are, the only sure way of getting to Heaven is to fight.

The Koran must be read in Arabic. Thus all believers are tied together by a common language. No matter what you do, you cannot go to Paradise unless you pray in Arabic. This shared language makes it much easier to plot and conspire.

And that prayer must be conducted five times each day. In Islamic states the practice is even enforced by law, as it ensures that daily life is dominated with the ideas of Islam. It is of course impossible to forget something that you are bowing down to five times a day, day in and day out. It requires no great insight to see that the more time and effort a person expends on something, the more he will value it. Thus, mere outward observance can eventually create believers.

Further, the practice of prayer is highly ritualized, involving washing first, the reciting of verses, the movement in time with others. All this creates a bond between the participants and Muslims believe that all Muslims are performing these actions in precisely the same way at the same moment right across the whole world.

The subordinate position of women is far from accidental. It is integral to Islam’s violent mission. Women tend to strongly object to seeing their sons and husbands going off to fight. So women are not allowed to leave the house unless accompanied by a male relative. A woman is not allowed to be a head of state or a judge. She may only inherit up to half of what a man may. Her testimony is only worth half of a man’s. She is not allowed to choose who she may be married to, and her husband cannot be a non-Muslim. She cannot divorce her husband, but he may divorce her at will and he may and indeed should beat her if she is disobedient to his will. Her only certain way into Paradise is if her husband is happy with her.

Whilst the Koran is unchangeable, Allah has obviously the right to edit it. This rule holds that if one passage of the Koran contradicts another, it is the latter passage that is correct. As the Koran was written over a period of twenty-three years, and during very changing circumstances, such contradictions occur frequently. The effect of this is for the earlier passages that proclaim a message of peace to be over-ridden by later passages that exhort and justify violence.

Islam aims for the conquest of the whole world. And as everyone knows large ambitions are powerful motivators. This is buttressed by fear of Hell and longing for Paradise. The subordination of the whole world will bring the process of conquest to and end and it is in this sense that Muslims can sincerely say, ‘Islam is the religion of peace.’

Where Muslims gain control of an area they must impose Sharia. Amongst other things this legalises the collection of a tax on non-Muslims of twenty-five percent of their income and thus supports Islamification and simultaneously provides an economic incentive to convert. This double edged process helps to account to the tiny numbers of non-Muslims who live in Islamic states. Their repression is reinforced by other measures, such as the Sharia prohibition on building non-Islamic places of worship. Nor is it permissible to utter non-Islamic prayers within the hearing of a Muslim or make any public display of any other faith. The Sharia prohibition against non-Muslims having weapons completes the subjection.

No Muslim is allowed to make friends with a non-Muslim. A Muslim may pretend to be friends. Indeed, the Koran advocates deceit when dealing with infidels (that is, all non-Muslims). This should hardly be surprizing. Attempting to deceive the enemy is a well established tactic and Islam is at war with the whole of the non-Islamic world. Examples of such deceits abound. Islamic leaders will tell the world one thing and then state very different messages in Arabic. Islamic charities collect money ostensibly for orphans and siphon the funds into organisations that are actively engaged in killing infidels.

The Koran says, ‘War is deceit’ and it encourages the use of any pretext to justify attacks on non-Muslims. Merely not wishing to be a Muslim is sufficient to justify holy war, as it is an attempt to prevent the bringing of the Word of God. And the only certain way for a man to enter Paradise is by fighting in a holy war. So any act of aggression is justified as a defence of Islam. The Koran repeatedly asserts that Muslims should imitate the Prophet and this was his practice.

In Islam all Muslims are superior to all infidels. The mere presence of infidels in the holy places of Islam is considered sufficient cause for war. Islam makes a virtue of double standards and inequality. For example, Islam must be spread, but other faiths may not attempt to convert Muslims, any such action is an ‘aggression’. Any defamation of Islam must be met with violence, but Muslims are required to incessantly defame all non-Islamic ideas. Muslims are encouraged to build as many mosques and madrases in the non-Islamic world as possible, but no places of non-Muslim worship may be built under Sharia. Another illustration of this double standard and inequality is the value of a human life. It is forbidden to kill a Muslim without ‘just cause’, but it is not forbidden to kill an infidel.

Islam is a theocracy. In an Islamic state everyone is a practising Muslim, or they are beaten, taxed or killed into extinction. No one may criticise Islam, not even in private. In such a state, it is almost impossible to think outside of the Islamic norms. Islam is a totalitarianism. And its aim is world domination. It cannot be appeased. It sees our values of tolerance and freedom of speech as weaknesses that it can exploit in order to destroy those very values and our civilisation. Islam is a serious threat. A clear and present danger …” semper vigilans

Make of it what you will.






I just love it—

—but before you go there, here below is a wee taster pic for you. This cheery and inspirational chappie cheerily admits that he was born in Britain, but he’s Islamic. Not British, if I got it right (except on dole day, perhaps?)… anyway, here he be:  your future.

If you do watch the video he’s not all that far in (about 12 seconds), and at this point he’s just been asked if he is British? His reply is words to the effect that “I identify myself as Muslim. If I was born in a stable, I wouldn’t be a horse blah blah blah … I mean, this is just the island I was born in—” etc etc. Such an earnest little turd, too … go there, you’ll love his candour. Fear it.

stone 'em!

“I want to see adulteress stoned to death, I want to see the hands of thieves cut off … I want to see Sharia law in Europe”

This guy and I would make a good team. Both of us bigots.

I want to see all Islamics sent back to their own Paradise. I want to see Islam expunged from Europe. And I want to see merciful compassionate little purdah poops like him rounded up and fired off back to where they will be grateful for sanctuary from all that western drivel about ‘Freedom’. And if born out of context (i.e. here, not there) then ship him back to where he’ll be right at home.

Ain’t gonna happen … so once again I make this prediction: Coming soon to a house in your very own street (wherever) … good ol’ Allah and his merry men in skirts and beards.

“Mr Argus, Sir?” semper vigilans

“Yes, Little Fatima?”

“Sir … how do you eat an elephant?”

“I’ll have to pass on that one.”

“One tiny bite at a time, Sir.”

Eek. And now, a wee scamp being shown the proper and correct thoughts to think—

Screen Shot 2016-05-16 at 22.09.32

and possibly grateful to all the Brit guys who died in various wars fighting for his right to think those thoughts (bugger, I hope I got that right—wouldn’t want to offend any nice Muslims by alluding that they might be ungrateful pigs).

Nice man explains

Nice man (the one with the knife still dripping blood) explains why he and a buddy had to drive their car over a Brit soldier (in a London street) and then saw his head off (in a London street)*.

But when you get to this guy, you’ll see why I’m so rapt—

Screen Shot 2016-05-16 at 22.24.43

—ain’t he just gorgeous, in discussion? Isn’t his command of debate something to behold, a paradigm even, for universities to emulate?

“Mr Argus, Sir?”

“Yes, Little Fatima?”

“Sir … what’s a ‘university’?”

“It’s just a big word, sweetie. Don’t sweat it, something to do with outdated concepts. Just get back to learning your Koran—gotta be word perfect, don’t forget.”

At this point I’ll quit while I still have some stomach contents left.

As I said before—

it’s your future, learn to love it

—thank heavens I’m old enough to know I shan’t see it myself …

… but you will …


* He wasn’t very good at it—bugger gave up only halfway through. (Honestly, what are compassionate and merciful Freedom Fighters coming to these days?)





—emasculated by circumstances, events, ‘progress’ … and Law.


when some vestige of Manhood in Britain grits its teeth, stands up and says “Thus far is too far, back off!

And promptly gets arrested.

Not good … so here’s a nice cheery vid for you, make of it what you will—

—and tell me where I’m wrong when I say that these animals should be rounded up and immediately detained in (dare I say it? Yes …) concentration camps and each time a shipload is collected, fired off back to the Islamic Paradise-On-Earth from whence they came.


do I have any takers? Anyone willing to debate, to pull the wings and feathers off my chickens-of-thought and expose me for an unfeeling brute? Go ahead~!

In a nutshell:semper vigilans

If I’m wrong—convince me. If you can. Words are cheap … but if you are British, or European—

  • you are about to reap what your inaction has sown
  • and you can always tune into the Disney Channel
  • (while it lasts) and convince yourself it’s not happening

—either way, just pretend it’s not happening—merely a transient bad dream and when you wake up all will still be the sweetness and light you were born into.

Screen Shot 2016-05-16 at 18.45.58MAY I MAKE A PREDICTION?
If (r) IF it’s not already happening, expect ‘flash mobs’. Herds of uncivilised savage Islamic thugs appearing out of nowhere and trashing iconic western treasures, then immediately dissipating. If not yet happening, it will. Actually … it just has.


bobby ain’t gonna help nobody. By the time the ‘authorities’ can concentrate valid counterforce, sufficient to safely do the job … too late. All gone.

The solution*?


and too bloody obvious for words. An outright ban on Sharia anything—no concessions in school (or any other) uniforms, no covered faces in public places at all, no new mosques and no blasted muezzins bawling into the streets whatsoever.


for any would-be immigrant—



or go home—end of story.

If you aren’t Christian, agnostic, atheist, Buddhist, Jewish, Hindu (anything else acceptable that doesn’t outright promote violence or violate our customs and laws*) within two years max then please empty your wallet into our coffers and leave forthwith. Islam totally unacceptableIslamic womanhood


I used to believe in ‘Free Speech’ and all that drivel. Theoretically sound, and very very appealing, but:  the snake you shelter will turn on you and bite your bum—such is the nature of snakes. (Remember, you read it here first.)


*  In our decadent unenlightened ‘civilisation’ we have we had quaint laws about ‘sex with children’. We expected all citizens to comply equally (until recently all Brits were theoretically equal in the sight of the law) (hell, even the figure of Justice on the courthouse is blindfolded) …